Table of Contents

Table of Contents

MONSTER BEVERAGE CORPORATION

1 Monster Way

Corona, California 92879

ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

TO BE HELD JUNE 14, 2016

April 26, 2016

Dear Stockholder:

You are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Monster Beverage Corporation (the “Company”) to be held on Tuesday, June 14, 2016 at 1:00 p.m. local time, at our corporate offices, located at 1 Monster Way, Corona, California 92879 (the “Annual Meeting”). This proxy is solicited on behalf of the Board of Directors of the Company.

In addition to the specific matters to be voted on at the Annual Meeting that are listed in the accompanying notice, there will be a report on the Company’s business and an opportunity for stockholders of the Company to ask questions.

We are pleased to take advantage of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission rule that allows companies to furnish proxy materials to their stockholders over the Internet. As a result, we are mailing to our stockholders a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”) instead of a paper copy of this proxy statement and our Annual Report to Stockholders for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015. We believe this process allows us to provide our stockholders with the information they need in a timely manner, while reducing the environmental impact and lowering costs of printing and distributing our proxy materials. The Notice contains instructions on how to access those documents over the Internet.  The Notice also contains instructions on how to request a paper copy of our proxy materials, including this proxy statement, our Annual Report to Stockholders for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 and a form of proxy card or voting instruction card.

I hope that you will be able to join us. Your vote is important to us and to our business. I encourage you to vote by telephone, over the Internet, or if you requested to receive printed proxy materials, by marking, signing, dating and returning your proxy card so that your shares will be represented and voted at the Annual Meeting, whether or not you plan to attend.  If you attend the Annual Meeting, you will, of course, have the right to revoke the proxy and vote your shares in person.

The proxy materials, including this proxy statement and our Annual Report to Stockholders for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, are being distributed and made available on or about April 26, 2016.

Table of Contents

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

TO BE HELD JUNE 14, 2016

TO THE STOCKHOLDERS OF THE COMPANY:

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Monster Beverage Corporation (“Monster” or the “Company”) will be held on Tuesday, June 14, 2016 at 1:00 p.m. local time, at the Company’s corporate offices, located at 1 Monster Way, Corona, California 92879 (the “Annual Meeting”), for the following purposes:

1.                                    To elect ten directors to serve until the 2017 annual meeting of stockholders of the Company;

2.                                    To ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP to serve as the independent registered public accounting firm of the Company for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2016;

3.                                    To approve, on a non-binding, advisory basis, the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers;

4.                                    To re-approve the material terms of the Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m) performance goals under the Monster Beverage Corporation 2011 Omnibus Incentive Plan;

5.                                    To consider a stockholder proposal requesting the Company’s board of directors adopt a “proxy access” bylaw, if properly presented at the Annual Meeting (the “Proxy Access Proposal”);

6.                                    To consider a stockholder proposal requesting the Company’s board of directors amend its corporate governance documents to provide that director nominees be elected by a majority vote standard, if properly presented at the Annual Meeting (the “Majority Vote Proposal”); and

7.                                    To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.

The foregoing items of business are more fully described in the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders accompanying this Notice. Only stockholders of the Company of record at the close of business on April 20, 2016 are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting and any adjournment or postponement thereof.

We will make available a list of stockholders as of the close of business on April 20, 2016 for inspection by stockholders during normal business hours from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. local time, from June 3, 2016 through June 13, 2016, at the Company’s executive offices, 1 Monster Way, Corona, CA 92879. This list will also be available to stockholders at the Annual Meeting.

All stockholders of the Company are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting in person.  However, to ensure your representation at the Annual Meeting, you are urged to vote by telephone, over the Internet, or if you requested to receive printed proxy materials, by marking, signing, dating and returning your proxy card.  You may revoke your voted proxy at any time prior to the Annual Meeting or vote in person if you attend the Annual Meeting.

Corona, California

April 26, 2016

Table of Contents

IMPORTANT:  WHETHER OR NOT YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THE ANNUAL MEETING, YOU ARE REQUESTED TO VOTE YOUR SHARES AS PROMPTLY AS POSSIBLE.  IN ADDITION TO VOTING IN PERSON, STOCKHOLDERS OF RECORD MAY VOTE VIA A TOLL FREE TELEPHONE NUMBER OR OVER THE INTERNET AS INSTRUCTED IN THESE MATERIALS.  IF YOU REQUESTED TO RECEIVE A PROXY CARD OR VOTING INSTRUCTION CARD BY MAIL, YOU MAY ALSO VOTE BY MARKING, SIGNING, DATING AND MAILING THE PROXY CARD PROMPTLY IN THE RETURN ENVELOPE PROVIDED.  PLEASE NOTE THAT IF YOUR SHARES ARE HELD BY A BROKER OR OTHER INTERMEDIARY AND YOU WISH TO VOTE AT THE ANNUAL MEETING, YOU MUST OBTAIN A LEGAL PROXY FORM FROM THAT RECORD HOLDER.

Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1

Table of Contents

General

The Board of Directors of Monster Beverage Corporation (“Monster” or the “Company”) is soliciting proxies to be voted at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company (the “Annual Meeting”) to be held on Tuesday, June 14, 2016 at 1:00 p.m. local time, for the purposes set forth herein and in the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company.  The Annual Meeting will be held at the Company’s executive offices located at 1 Monster Way, Corona, California 92879.  In this proxy, unless the context requires otherwise, references to “we”, “our”, or “us” refer to Monster.

The proxy materials, including this proxy statement and our Annual Report to Stockholders for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, are being distributed and made available on or about April 26, 2016. This proxy statement contains important information for you to consider when deciding how to vote on matters brought before the Annual Meeting. Please read it carefully.

Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials

In accordance with rules and regulations adopted by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), we have elected to provide our stockholders access to our proxy materials over the Internet. Accordingly, a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”) will be mailed on or about April 26, 2016 to our stockholders who owned the Company’s common stock, par value $0.005 per share (the “Common Stock”), at the close of business on April 20, 2016. Stockholders will have the ability to access the proxy materials on a website referred to in the Notice, or request that a printed set of the proxy materials be sent to them by following the instructions in the Notice.

Householding

If you are a beneficial owner, your bank or broker may deliver a single proxy statement, along with individual proxy cards, or individual Notices to any household at which two or more stockholders reside unless contrary instructions have been received from you. This procedure, referred to as householding, reduces the volume of duplicate materials shareholders receive and reduces mailing expenses. Stockholders may revoke their consent to future householding mailings or enroll in householding mailings by contacting American Stock Transfer and Trust Company, LLC, 1-800-937-5449, or by writing to American Stock Transfer and Trust Company, LLC, 6201 15th Ave, Brooklyn, NY 11219.  Alternatively, if you wish to receive a separate set of proxy materials for this year’s Annual Meeting, we will deliver them promptly upon request to Monster Beverage Corporation, 1 Monster Way, Corona, CA 92879 or by calling (951) 739-6200 or (800) 426-7367.

Record Date, Outstanding Voting Securities

Holders of record of Common Stock at the close of business on April 20, 2016 are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting. Each share entitles its holder to one vote. As of the record date, 203,042,661 shares of our Common Stock were issued and outstanding. There are no other outstanding voting securities of the Company.

2

Table of Contents

Quorum

The presence, in person or by proxy, of the holders of one-third of the shares of Common Stock entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting is necessary to constitute a quorum at the Annual Meeting.  Such stockholders are counted as present at the Annual Meeting if they (i) are present in person at the Annual Meeting or (ii) have properly submitted their vote by telephone, over the Internet, or by returning their proxy card. Abstentions and withheld votes will be counted for determining whether a quorum is present for the Annual Meeting.

Required Vote

In accordance with the Company’s by-laws:

in each case, provided a quorum is present.

With respect to the election of directors, you may vote “for” or “withhold” authority to vote for each of the nominees for the Board. If you “withhold” authority to vote with respect to one or more director nominees, your vote will have no effect on the election of such nominees (except with respect to the director resignation policy). Broker non-votes will have no effect on the election of the nominees. With respect to the other proposals, you may vote “for,” “against” or “abstain” from voting. If you “abstain” from voting, your vote will have no effect for these proposals. Broker non-votes will also have no effect on the vote for these

3

Table of Contents

proposals.

Non-Discretionary Proposals

If you are a beneficial owner and hold your shares in street name and do not provide the organization that holds your shares with voting instructions, the broker or other intermediary will determine if it has the discretionary authority to vote on the particular matter. Brokers and other intermediaries may not vote uninstructed shares in (i) the election of directors, (ii) the approval of the Say-on-Pay Proposal, (iii) the re-approval of the Code Section 162(m) performance goals under the 2011 Incentive Plan, (iv) the approval of the Proxy Access Proposal, and (v) the approval of the Majority Voting Proposal. If your shares are held by a broker or other intermediary and you do not instruct your broker or other intermediary how to vote for each of these proposals, no votes will be cast on your behalf. Therefore, it is important that you cast your vote if you want it to count for each of these proposals.

Discretionary Proposals

Brokers that do not receive instructions are entitled to vote on the ratification of the independent registered public accounting firm.

No stockholder shall be entitled to cumulate votes.  American Stock Transfer & Trust Company (“AST”) will receive and tabulate the proxies.

Board of Directors’ Recommendations

The Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board of Directors” or the “Board”) recommends a vote:

·                 “FOR” each of the nominees to the Board (Proposal One);

·                 “FOR” the ratification of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accountants for fiscal year 2016 (Proposal Two);

·                 “FOR”, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers (Proposal Three);

·                 “FOR” the re-approval of the Code Section 162(m) performance goals under the 2011 Incentive Plan (Proposal Four);

·                 “AGAINST” the Proxy Access Proposal (Proposal Five); and

·                 “AGAINST” the Majority Voting Proposal (Proposal Six).

How to Vote

If on April 20, 2016 your shares are registered directly in your name with the Company’s registrar and transfer agent, AST, you are considered a stockholder of record with respect to those shares, and the Notice was sent to you directly by the Company. As the stockholder of record, you have the right to grant your voting proxy directly to the Company or to vote in person at the Annual Meeting.

If you are a stockholder of record and you sign and submit a proxy card, but you do not provide voting instructions on the card, your shares will be voted “for” proposal 1,2,3 and 4 and “against” proposals 5 and 6.

4

Table of Contents

If on April 20, 2016 your shares are held in a brokerage account, bank, broker-dealer, trust or similar organization, you are considered the “beneficial owner” of those shares held in street name, and the Notice was forwarded to you by that organization. The organization that holds your shares is considered the stockholder of record for purposes of voting at the Annual Meeting. Because you are not the stockholder of record, you may not vote your shares at the Annual Meeting unless you request and obtain a valid proxy from the organization that holds your shares giving you the right to vote your shares at the Annual Meeting. As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker or other intermediary how to vote your shares, and you are also invited to attend the Annual Meeting.

Your vote is very important to us and we hope that you will attend the Annual Meeting. However, whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, please vote by proxy in accordance with the instructions on your proxy card, voting instruction form (from your broker or other intermediary), or the instructions that you received through electronic mail. There are three convenient ways of submitting your vote:

·                 By Telephone or Internet - All stockholders of record can vote by touchtone telephone from the U.S. using the toll free telephone number on the proxy card, or over the Internet, using the procedures and instructions described on the proxy card. Beneficial owners may vote by telephone or Internet if their broker or other intermediary makes those methods available, in which case the broker or other intermediary will enclose the instructions with the proxy materials. The telephone and Internet voting procedures are designed to authenticate stockholders’ identities, to allow stockholders to vote their shares, and to confirm that their instructions have been recorded properly.

·                 In Person - All stockholders of record may vote in person at the Annual Meeting. Beneficial owners may vote in person at the Annual Meeting if their broker or other intermediary has furnished a legal proxy. If you are a beneficial owner and would like to vote your shares by proxy, you will need to ask your broker or other intermediary to furnish you with a legal proxy.  You will need to bring the legal proxy with you to the Annual Meeting and hand it in with a signed ballot that will be provided to you at the Annual Meeting. You will not be able to vote your shares without a legal proxy.

·                 By Written Proxy - All stockholders of record can vote by written proxy card, if they have requested to receive printed proxy materials. If you are a beneficial holder and you requested to receive printed proxy materials, you will receive a written proxy card and a voting instruction form from your broker or other intermediary.

Revocability of Proxies

If you are a stockholder of record, you may revoke your proxy and change your vote at any time before the Annual Meeting by: (i) delivering a written notice of revocation to our Secretary at our principal executive offices; (ii) voting again over the Internet or by telephone (only your latest Internet or telephone proxy submitted prior to the Annual Meeting will be counted) or, if you requested and received written proxy materials, by signing and returning a new proxy card with a later date; or (iii) by attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person.

5

Table of Contents

If you are a beneficial owner, you may revoke your proxy and change your vote at any time before the Annual Meeting by: (i) submitting new voting instructions to your broker or other intermediary; or (ii) if you have obtained a legal proxy from your broker or other intermediary, by attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person.

Solicitation

The cost of soliciting proxies will be borne by the Company. The Company will reimburse brokerage firms and other persons representing beneficial owners of shares for their expenses in forwarding solicitation material to such beneficial owners.  In addition to solicitation by use of the mail or via the Internet, proxies may also be solicited by certain of the Company’s directors, officers and regular employees, without additional compensation, personally or by telephone, facsimile or letter. In addition, the Company has engaged D.F. King & Co., Inc. to act as its proxy solicitor and has agreed to pay approximately $9,000.00 plus reasonable expenses for such services.

6

Table of Contents

PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS AND SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF MANAGEMENT

The following table sets forth, as of the most recent practical date, April 15, 2016 (unless otherwise noted below), the beneficial ownership of the Company’s Common Stock of (a) those persons known to the Company to be the beneficial owners of more than 5% of the Company’s Common Stock; (b) each of the Company’s directors and nominees for director; (c) the Company’s named executive officers; and (d) all of the Company’s current directors and executive officers as a group. In computing the number and percentage of shares beneficially owned by each person, we include any shares of Common Stock that could be acquired within 60 days of April 15, 2016 by the exercise of options or the vesting of restricted stock units. Such shares, however, are not counted in computing the percentage ownership of any other person.

Officers and Directors as a group (11 members: 20,776,127 shares or 10.2% in aggregate).

* Except as noted otherwise, the address for each of the named stockholders is 1 Monster Way, Corona, California 92879.

** Less than 1%.

7

Table of Contents

1 The mailing address of Brandon Limited Partnership No. 1 (‘‘Brandon No. 1’’) is 56 Conduit Street, London W1S 2YZ England. The general partners of Brandon No. 1 are Rodney C. Sacks and Hilton H. Schlosberg.

2 The mailing address of Brandon Limited Partnership No. 2 (‘‘Brandon No. 2’’) is 56 Conduit Street, London W1S 2YZ England. The general partners of Brandon No. 2 are Rodney C. Sacks and Hilton H. Schlosberg.

3 Based on Schedule 13G/A, filed February 12, 2016 by FMR LLC, based on common shares held on December 31, 2015. The mailing address of this reporting person is 245 Summer Street, Boston, MA 02210.

4 Based on Schedule 13G/A, filed February 12, 2015 by Wellington Management Company, LLP, based on common shares held on December 31, 2014. The mailing address of this reporting person is 280 Congress Street, Boston, MA 02210.

5 Based on Schedule 13D, filed June 22, 2015 by The Coca-Cola Company and European Refreshments, based on common shares held on June 22, 2015, for which they have shared beneficial ownership. The mailing address of The Coca-Cola Company is One Coca-Cola Plaza, Atlanta, GA 30313. The mailing address of European Refreshments is Southgate, Dublin Road, Drogheda, County Meath, Ireland.

6 Includes 1,770,098 common shares owned by Mr. Sacks; 1,881,856 shares beneficially held by Brandon No. 1 because Mr. Sacks is one of Brandon No. 1’s general partners; 9,795,648 shares beneficially held by Brandon No. 2 because Mr. Sacks is one of Brandon No. 2’s general partners; 34,924 shares beneficially held by Hilrod Holdings IV, L.P. because Mr. Sacks is one of Hilrod Holdings IV’s general partners; 71,428 shares beneficially held by Hilrod Holdings V, L.P. because Mr. Sacks is one of Hilrod Holdings V’s general partners; 107,900 shares beneficially held by Hilrod Holdings VI, L.P. because Mr. Sacks is one of Hilrod Holdings VI’s general partners; 40,072 shares beneficially held by Hilrod Holdings VII, L.P. because Mr. Sacks is one of Hilrod Holdings VII’s general partners; 189,528 shares beneficially held by Hilrod Holdings VIII, L.P. because Mr. Sacks is one of Hilrod Holdings VIII’s general partners; 151,148 shares beneficially held by Hilrod Holdings IX, L.P. because Mr. Sacks is one of Hilrod Holdings IX’s general partners; 83,306 shares beneficially held by Hilrod Holdings X, L.P. because Mr. Sacks is one of Hilrod Holdings X’s general partners; 168,414 shares beneficially held by Hilrod Holdings XI, L.P. because Mr. Sacks is one of Hilrod Holdings XI’s general partners; 133,004 shares beneficially held by Hilrod Holdings XII, L.P. because Mr. Sacks is one of Hilrod Holdings XII’s general partners; 636,080 shares beneficially held by Hilrod Holdings XIII, L.P. because Mr. Sacks is one of Hilrod Holdings XIII’s general partners; 1,823,322 shares beneficially held by Hilrod Holdings XIV, L.P. because Mr. Sacks is one of Hilrod Holdings XIV’s general partners; 233,628 shares beneficially held by Hilrod Holdings XV, L.P. because Mr. Sacks is one of Hilrod Holdings XV’s general partners; 77,121 shares beneficially held by the Rodney C. Sacks 2009 GRAT #2 because Mr. Sacks is the trustee of the Rodney C. Sacks 2009 GRAT #2; 35,162 shares beneficially held by the RCS Direct 2010 GRAT because Mr. Sacks is the trustee of the RCS Direct 2010 GRAT; and 1,612 shares beneficially held by the RCS Direct 2010 GRAT #2 because Mr. Sacks is the trustee of the RCS Direct 2010 GRAT #2. Also includes options presently exercisable to purchase 81,617 common shares, exercisable at $15.86 per share, granted pursuant to a stock option agreement dated June 2, 2008 between the Company and Mr. Sacks; options presently exercisable to purchase 100,000 common shares, exercisable at $17.82 per share, granted pursuant to a stock option agreement dated December 1, 2009 between the Company and Mr. Sacks; options presently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days to purchase 210,000 common shares, exercisable at $53.96 per share, granted pursuant to a stock option agreement dated June 3, 2013 between the Company and Mr. Sacks (of which options to purchase 70,000 common shares are currently held by Hilrod Holdings XV, L.P.); options presently exercisable to purchase 140,000 common shares, exercisable at $70.06 per share, granted pursuant to a stock option agreement dated March 14, 2014 between the Company and Mr. Sacks; and options presently exercisable to purchase 26,400 common shares, exercisable at $135.48 per share, granted pursuant to a stock option agreement dated March 13, 2015 between the Company and Mr. Sacks. On January 31, 2014, Mr. Sacks pledged 1,000,000 common shares.

Mr. Sacks disclaims beneficial ownership of all shares deemed beneficially owned by him hereunder except (i) 1,770,098 common shares; (ii) 558,017 shares presently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days under the stock option agreements; (iii) 349 shares beneficially held by Hilrod Holdings IV, L.P. because Mr. Sacks is one of Hilrod Holdings IV’s general partners; (iv) 714 shares beneficially held by Hilrod Holdings V, L.P. because Mr. Sacks is one of Hilrod Holdings V’s

8

Table of Contents

general partners; (v) 1,079 shares beneficially held by Hilrod Holdings VI, L.P. because Mr. Sacks is one of Hilrod Holdings VI’s general partners; (vi) 401 shares beneficially held by Hilrod Holdings VII, L.P. because Mr. Sacks is one of Hilrod Holdings VII’s general partners; (vii) 1,895 shares beneficially held by Hilrod Holdings VIII, L.P. because Mr. Sacks is one of Hilrod Holdings VIII’s general partners; (viii) 1,511 shares beneficially held by Hilrod Holdings IX, L.P. because Mr. Sacks is one of Hilrod Holdings IX’s general partners; (ix) 833 shares beneficially held by Hilrod Holdings X, L.P. because Mr. Sacks is one of Hilrod Holdings X’s general partners; (x) 1,684 shares beneficially held by Hilrod Holdings XI, L.P. because Mr. Sacks is one of Hilrod Holdings XI’s general partners; (xi) 1,330 shares beneficially held by Hilrod Holdings XII, L.P. because Mr. Sacks is one of Hilrod Holdings XII’s general partners; (xii) 6,361 shares beneficially held by Hilrod Holdings XIII, L.P. because Mr. Sacks is one of Hilrod Holdings XIII’s general partners; (xiii) 18,233 shares beneficially held by Hilrod Holdings XIV, L.P. because Mr. Sacks is one of Hilrod Holdings XIV’s general partners; and (xiv) 2,336 shares beneficially held by Hilrod Holdings XV, L.P. because Mr. Sacks is one of Hilrod Holdings XV’s general partners.

7 Includes 1,745,996 common shares owned by Mr. Schlosberg; 1,881,856 shares beneficially held by Brandon No. 1 because Mr. Schlosberg is one of Brandon No. 1’s general partners; 9,795,648 shares beneficially held by Brandon No. 2 because Mr. Schlosberg is one of Brandon No. 2’s general partners; 34,924 shares beneficially held by Hilrod Holdings IV, L.P. because Mr. Schlosberg is one of Hilrod Holdings IV’s general partners; 71,428 shares beneficially held by Hilrod Holdings V, L.P. because Mr. Schlosberg is one of Hilrod Holdings V’s general partners; 107,900 shares beneficially held by Hilrod Holdings VI, L.P. because Mr. Schlosberg is one of Hilrod Holdings VI’s general partners; 40,072 shares beneficially held by Hilrod Holdings VII, L.P. because Mr. Schlosberg is one of Hilrod Holdings VII’s general partners; 189,528 shares beneficially held by Hilrod Holdings VIII, L.P. because Mr. Schlosberg is one of Hilrod Holdings VIII’s general partners; 151,148 shares beneficially held by Hilrod Holdings IX, L.P. because Mr. Schlosberg is one of Hilrod Holdings IX’s general partners; 83,306 shares beneficially held by Hilrod Holdings X, L.P. because Mr. Schlosberg is one of Hilrod Holdings X’s general partners; 168,414 shares beneficially held by Hilrod Holdings XI, L.P. because Mr. Schlosberg is one of Hilrod Holdings XI’s general partners; 133,004 shares beneficially held by Hilrod Holdings XII, L.P. because Mr. Schlosberg is one of Hilrod Holdings XII’s general partners; 636,080 shares beneficially held by Hilrod Holdings XIII, L.P. because Mr. Schlosberg is one of Hilrod Holdings XIII’s general partners; 1,823,322 shares beneficially held by Hilrod Holdings XIV, L.P. because Mr. Schlosberg is one of Hilrod Holdings XIV’s general partners; 233,628 shares beneficially held by Hilrod Holdings XV, L.P. because Mr. Schlosberg is one of Hilrod Holdings XV’s general partners; 30,068 shares beneficially held by the Rodney C. Sacks 2008 GRAT #2 because Mr. Schlosberg is the co-trustee of the Rodney C. Sacks 2008 GRAT #2; and 68,438 shares beneficially held by the RCS Direct 2011 GRAT because Mr. Schlosberg is the trustee of the RCS Direct 2011 GRAT. Also includes options presently exercisable to purchase 81,617 common shares, exercisable at $15.86 per share, granted pursuant to a stock option agreement dated June 2, 2008 between the Company and Mr. Schlosberg; options presently exercisable to purchase 100,000 common shares, exercisable at $17.82 per share, granted pursuant to a stock option agreement dated December 1, 2009 between the Company and Mr. Schlosberg; options presently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days to purchase 210,000 common shares, exercisable at $53.96 per share, granted pursuant to a stock option agreement dated June 3, 2013 between the Company and Mr. Schlosberg (of which options to purchase 70,000 common shares are currently held by Hilrod Holdings XV, L.P.); options presently exercisable to purchase 140,000 common shares, exercisable at $70.06 per share, granted pursuant to a stock option agreement dated March 14, 2014 between the Company and Mr. Schlosberg; and options presently exercisable to purchase 26,400 common shares, exercisable at $135.48 per share, granted pursuant to a stock option agreement dated March 13, 2015 between the Company and Mr. Schlosberg. On January 31, 2014, Mr. Schlosberg pledged 1,000,000 common shares.

Mr. Schlosberg disclaims beneficial ownership of all shares deemed beneficially owned by him hereunder except (i) 1,745,996 common shares; (ii) 558,017 shares presently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days under the stock option agreements; (iii) 349 shares beneficially held by Hilrod Holdings IV, L.P. because Mr. Schlosberg is one of Hilrod Holdings IV’s general partners; (iv) 714 shares beneficially held by Hilrod Holdings V, L.P. because Mr. Schlosberg is one of Hilrod Holdings V’s general partners; (v) 1,079 shares beneficially held by Hilrod Holdings VI, L.P. because Mr. Schlosberg is one of Hilrod Holdings VI’s general partners; (vi) 401 shares beneficially held by Hilrod Holdings VII, L.P. because Mr. Schlosberg is one of Hilrod Holdings VII’s general partners; (vii) 1,895 shares beneficially held by Hilrod Holdings VIII, L.P. because Mr. Schlosberg is one of Hilrod Holdings VIII’s general partners; (viii) 1,511 shares beneficially held by Hilrod Holdings IX, L.P. because Mr. Schlosberg is one of Hilrod Holdings IX’s general partners; (ix) 833 shares beneficially held by Hilrod Holdings X, L.P. because Mr. Schlosberg is one of Hilrod Holdings X’s general partners; (x) 1,684 shares beneficially held by Hilrod Holdings XI, L.P. because Mr. Schlosberg is one of Hilrod Holdings XI’s general partners; (xi) 1,330 shares beneficially held by Hilrod Holdings XII, L.P. because Mr. Schlosberg is one of Hilrod Holdings XII’s general partners; (xii) 6,361 shares beneficially held by Hilrod Holdings XIII, L.P. because Mr. Schlosberg is one of

9

Table of Contents

Hilrod Holdings XIII’s general partners; (xiii) 18,233 shares beneficially held by Hilrod Holdings XIV, L.P. because Mr. Schlosberg is one of Hilrod Holdings XIV’s general partners; and (xiv) 2,336 shares beneficially held by Hilrod Holdings XV, L.P. because Mr. Schlosberg is one of Hilrod Holdings XV’s general partners.

8 Includes 972 restricted stock units granted pursuant to a restricted stock unit agreement dated August 7, 2015 between the Company and Mr. Fayard.

9 Includes 263,936 common shares owned by Mr. Hall; 5,000 shares beneficially held by the MJCF Hall Family Trust, the beneficiaries of which are Mr. Hall and his spouse; options presently exercisable to purchase 80,000 common shares, exercisable at $17.82 per share, granted pursuant to a stock option agreement dated December 1, 2009 between the Company and Mr. Hall; options presently exercisable to purchase 40,000 common shares, exercisable at $26.26 per share, granted pursuant to a stock option agreement dated December 1, 2010 between the Company and Mr. Hall; options presently exercisable to purchase 35,000 common shares, exercisable at $47.13 per share, granted pursuant to a stock option agreement dated March 14, 2013 between the Company and Mr. Hall; options presently exercisable to purchase 3,000 common shares, exercisable at $70.06 per share, granted pursuant to a stock option agreement dated March 14, 2014 between the Company and Mr. Hall; and options presently exercisable to purchase 20,000 common shares, exercisable at $135.48 per share, granted pursuant to a stock option agreement dated March 13, 2015 between the Company and Mr. Hall.

10 Includes 14,217 common shares owned by Mr. Kelly; options presently exercisable to purchase 3,000 common shares, exercisable at $47.13 per share, granted pursuant to a stock option agreement dated March 14, 2013 between the Company and Mr. Kelly; options presently exercisable to purchase 1,000 common shares, exercisable at $70.06 per share, granted pursuant to a stock option agreement dated March 14, 2014 between the Company and Mr. Kelly; options presently exercisable to purchase 2,400 common shares, exercisable at $135.48 per share, granted pursuant to a stock option agreement dated March 13, 2015 between the Company and Mr. Kelly; and 1,500 restricted stock units granted pursuant to a restricted stock unit agreement dated June 1, 2012 between the Company and Mr. Kelly.

11 Includes 17,200 common shares owned by Mr. Selati; and 972 restricted stock units granted pursuant to a restricted stock unit agreement dated August 7, 2015 between the Company and Mr. Selati.

12 Includes 5,299 common shares owned by Mr. Epstein; 8,000 shares beneficially held by Shoreland Investments because Mr. Epstein is one of Shoreland Investment’s general partners; and 972 restricted stock units granted pursuant to a restricted stock unit agreement dated August 7, 2015 between the Company and Mr. Epstein.

13 Includes 33,684 common shares owned by Mr. Taber; options presently exercisable to purchase 4,334 common shares, exercisable at $19.20 per share, granted pursuant to a stock option agreement dated June 9, 2010 between the Company and Mr. Taber; options presently exercisable to purchase 2,590 common shares, exercisable at $34.06 per share, granted pursuant to a stock option agreement dated May 18, 2011 between the Company and Mr. Taber; and 972 restricted stock units granted pursuant to a restricted stock unit agreement dated August 7, 2015 between the Company and Mr. Taber.

14 Includes 6,964 common shares owned by Mr. Polk; options presently exercisable to purchase 4,334 common shares, exercisable at $19.20 per share, granted pursuant to a stock option agreement dated June 9, 2010 between the Company and Mr. Polk; options presently exercisable to purchase 2,590 common shares, exercisable at $34.06 per share, granted pursuant to a stock option agreement dated May 18, 2011 between the Company and Mr. Polk; and 972 restricted stock units granted pursuant to a restricted stock unit agreement dated August 7, 2015 between the Company and Mr. Polk.

15 Includes 972 restricted stock units granted pursuant to a restricted stock unit agreement dated August 7, 2015 between the Company and Ms. Waller.

16 Includes 20,488 common shares owned by Mr. Vidergauz; and 972 restricted stock units granted pursuant to a restricted stock unit agreement dated August 7, 2015 between the Company and Mr. Vidergauz.

10

Table of Contents

SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) requires the Company’s directors, executive officers, and persons who own more than ten percent of a registered class of the Company’s equity securities to file by specific dates with the SEC initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of equity securities of the Company. Directors, executive officers, and greater than ten percent stockholders are required by SEC regulations to furnish the Company with copies of all Section 16(a) forms that they file. The Company is required to report in this proxy statement any failure of its directors, executive officers and greater than ten percent stockholders to file by the relevant due date any of these reports during the most recent fiscal year or prior fiscal years.

To the Company’s knowledge, based solely on review of copies of such reports furnished to the Company during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to the Company’s directors, executive officers and greater than ten percent stockholders were complied with.

DEADLINES FOR RECEIPT OF STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS

Stockholders may present a proper proposal for consideration at the 2016 annual meeting of stockholders by submitting their proposal in writing to the Office of the Secretary of the Company at the Company’s principal executive offices in a timely manner.

For stockholders who wish to present a proposal to be considered for inclusion in our proxy statement and for consideration at the 2017 annual meeting, pursuant to Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act, the proposal must be delivered to the Office of the Secretary at the Company’s principal executive offices no later than December 27, 2016. Stockholder proposals must otherwise comply with the requirements of Rule 14a-8 of the Exchange Act.

For stockholders who wish to present a proposal for nominations or other business for consideration at the 2017 annual meeting, but who do not intend for the proposal to be included in our proxy statement, pursuant to the advance notice provisions contained in our by-laws, the proposal must be delivered to the Office of the Secretary at the Company’s principal executive offices no earlier than February 14, 2017 and no later than March 16, 2017, provided, however, that in the event that the date of the 2017 annual meeting is more than thirty days before or more than seventy days after the first anniversary of the preceding year’s annual meeting, notice by the stockholder must be so delivered no earlier than the close of business on the one hundred twentieth day prior to the 2017 annual meeting and no later than the close of business on the later of the ninetieth day prior to the 2017 annual meeting or the tenth day following the day on which public announcement of the date of the 2017 annual meeting is first made by the Company.

It is presently intended that the 2017 annual meeting will be held in June 2017.

Proposals should be sent to the Office of the Secretary by mail to Monster Beverage Corporation, 1 Monster Way, Corona, California, 92879.

11

Table of Contents

PROPOSAL ONE

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Nominees

The Board is currently comprised of ten members, each of whom is a director nominee to be elected at the Annual Meeting. Unless otherwise instructed, the proxy holders will vote the proxies received by them for the Company’s ten nominees named below.  In the event that any nominee is unable or declines to serve as a director at the time of the Annual Meeting, the proxies will be voted for any nominee designated by the present Board to fill the vacancy. The Company is not aware of any nominee who will be unable or expects to decline to serve as a director. The term of office of each person elected as a director will continue until the 2017 annual meeting or until a successor has been elected and qualified.

The Board has a director resignation policy. This policy provides that, in an uncontested election, any incumbent director nominee who receives a greater number of votes “WITHHELD” from his or her election than votes “FOR” his or her election must promptly tender his or her resignation to the Board following certification of the election results. The Nominating Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Nominating Committee”) will review the circumstances surrounding the election and recommend to the Board whether to accept or reject the resignation. The Board must act on the tendered resignation. If such resignation is rejected, the Board must publicly disclose its decision, together with the rationale supporting its decision, within 90 days after certification of the election results. A copy of the director resignation policy is available on our website at http://investors.monsterbevcorp.com/governance. cfm.

The names of the nominees, and certain biographical information about them, are set forth below.

1 Member of the Executive Committee of the Board of Directors.

2 Member of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors.

3 Member of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors.

4 Member of the Nominating Committee of the Board of Directors.

5 Lead Independent Director.

12

Table of Contents

Each of our directors brings extensive management and leadership experience gained through their service in our industry and other diverse businesses. In these roles, they have assumed day-to-day leadership or other senior leadership responsibilities. In addition, most current directors bring board experience acquired by either significant experience on other boards or long service on our Board of Directors that broadens their knowledge of board policies and processes, rules and regulations, issues and solutions. The Nominating Committee’s process for selecting and nominating qualified director candidates is described under the section entitled “Nominating Committee.” In the paragraphs below, we describe specific individual qualifications and skills of our directors that contribute to the overall effectiveness of our Board of Directors and its committees.

Rodney C. Sacks—Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company, Chief Executive Officer and a director of the Company from November 1990 to the present. Member of the Executive Committee of the Board of Directors (the “Executive Committee”) since October 1992. Chairman of the Board of Directors and a Director of Monster Energy Company (“MEC”) from June 1992 to the present. Mr. Sacks has led the Company for over 26 years and has extensive experience in the food and beverage industry. Mr. Sacks has detailed knowledge and valuable perspective and insights regarding our business and has responsibility for development and implementation of our business strategy.

Hilton H. Schlosberg—Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company, President, Chief Operating Officer, Secretary, and a Director of the Company from November 1990 to the present. Chief Financial Officer of the Company since July 1996. Member of the Executive Committee since October 1992. Vice Chairman, Secretary and a Director of MEC from July 1992 to the present. Mr. Schlosberg has held senior leadership positions with the Company for over 26 years, has been the Company’s CFO for 20 years and has extensive experience in the food and beverage industry. Mr. Schlosberg has a high level of financial literacy, his day-to-day supervision of business operations and co-leadership with Mr. Sacks brings valuable insight to the Board. Mr. Schlosberg has detailed knowledge and valuable perspective and insights regarding our business and has responsibility for development and implementation of our business strategy.

Mark J. Hall—Director of the Company and Chief Marketing Officer of MEC since January 2015. Chief Brand Officer of MEC from January 2014 to December 2014, and President of the Monster Beverage Division from January 2007 to December 2013. Mr. Hall joined MEC in 1997 as a Senior Vice President. Prior to joining MEC, Mr. Hall was employed by the Arizona Beverage Co. as Vice President of Sales, where he was responsible for sales and distribution of products through a national network of beer distributors and soft drink bottlers in the United States. Mr. Hall has detailed knowledge and valuable perspective and insights regarding both our business and the beverage business in general.

Norman C. Epstein—Director of the Company and member of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (the “Compensation Committee”) since June 1992, member of the Nominating Committee of the Board of Directors (the “Nominating Committee”) since September 2004 and member of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors (the “Audit Committee”) since September 1997. Mr. Epstein has served as the Chairman of the Compensation Committee September 1997 and Vice Chairman of the Audit Committee since February 27, 2015. Mr. Epstein served as Chairman of the Audit Committee from September 1997 to February 27, 2015. Director of MEC since July 1992. Managing Director of Cheval Property Finance PLC, a mortgage finance company based in London, England from 1997 to 2006. Director

13

Table of Contents

of Clermont Consultants UK Ltd. from 1997 to April 2013. Director of Spring Finance UK, a UK mortgage lender from July 2012 to the present. Partner with Moore Stephens, an international accounting firm, from 1974 to December 1996 (senior partner beginning in 1989 and the managing partner of Moore Stephens, New York from 1993 until 1995). Mr. Epstein has a strong background in accounting and finance as well as substantial experience in public company accounting. Mr. Epstein has substantial experience serving on boards, both the Company’s and others, and has experience in other industries, which allows him to bring additional perspective to the Board. Mr. Epstein is a Chartered Accountant (UK).

Gary P. Fayard—Director of the Company since June 2015 and member of the Audit Committee since February 2016.  Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of The Coca-Cola Company from February 2003 to April 2014. Mr. Fayard joined The Coca-Cola Company in 1994, and in July 1994, he was elected Vice President and Controller, a position he held until December 1999 when he was elected Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Fayard has also served on the board of directors of Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V., the largest bottler in the world of Coca-Cola trademark beverages by unit case volume operating in territories in Mexico, Central and South America and the Philippines, from 2004 to March 2016 and on the board of directors of Genuine Parts Company from 2014 to the present. Mr. Fayard has a strong background in accounting and finance as well as substantial business and leadership experience in the beverage industry.

Benjamin M. Polk—Director of the Company since November 1990. Assistant Secretary of MEC since October 1992 and a Director of MEC since July 1992. Partner with Veritas Capital, a private equity firm, since July 2011. Director of Aeroflex Holding Corp. from November 2012 to September 2014. Director of CPI International, Inc. from October 2012 to the present. Director of Truven Health Analytics, Inc. from October 2012 to April 7, 2016. Mr. Polk was a partner with the law firm of Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP from May 2004 to July 2011 and prior to that, a partner with the law firm of Winston & Strawn LLP, where Mr. Polk practiced law with that firm and its predecessor firm, from August 1976 to May 2004. Mr. Polk has gained detailed knowledge of the Company during his service as a director since 1990 and as outside counsel from 1990 to July 2011. Mr. Polk has extensive experience in matters relating to mergers, acquisitions and corporate finance.

Sydney Selati—Director of the Company and member of the Audit Committee since September 2004, member of the Compensation Committee since March 2007 and member of the Nominating Committee since April 2009. Mr. Selati was named Chairman of the Audit Committee on February 27, 2015. Mr. Selati has been a Director and Chairman of the Audit Committee of the San Diego Jewish Community Foundation since July 2010. Mr. Selati was a director of Barbeques Galore Ltd. from 1997 to 2005 and was President and Chairman of the Board of Directors of The Galore Group (U.S.A.), Inc. from 1988 to 2005. Mr. Selati was president of Sussex Group Limited from 1984 to 1988. Mr. Selati has extensive experience as a chief executive and board member of companies in other industries, which allows him to bring additional perspective to the board. Mr. Selati is a Chartered Accountant (South Africa).

Harold C. Taber, Jr.—Director of the Company since July 1992, member of the Audit Committee since April 2000, member of the Compensation Committee since April 2009 and member of the Nominating Committee since September 2004. Mr. Taber was appointed by the Board of Directors to be Chairman of the Nominating Committee in April 2009. Mr. Taber worked for the Coca-Cola Bottling Company of Los Angeles in various positions from 1976 to 1987, including Group President, West Region. President and Chief Executive Officer of MEC from July 1992 to June 1997. Consultant for The Joseph Company from October 1997 to March 1999 and for Costa Macaroni Manufacturing Company from July 2000 to January 2002. Executive Assistant to the Dean at the Biola University School of Business from July 2002 to January 2015. Mr. Taber has extensive knowledge of the Company’s historical and current operations, and brings leadership and management skills to the board.

14

Table of Contents

Kathy N. Waller—Director of the Company since June 2015. Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of The Coca-Cola Company, from April 2014 to the present. Ms. Waller joined The Coca-Cola Company in 1987 as a senior accountant in the Accounting Research Department and has served in a number of accounting and finance roles of increasing responsibility. From July 2004 to August 2009, Ms. Waller served as Chief of Internal Audit. In December 2005, she was elected Vice President of The Coca-Cola Company, and in August 2009, she was elected Controller. In August 2013, she became Vice President, Finance and Controller of The Coca-Cola Company, assuming additional responsibilities for corporate treasury, corporate tax and finance capabilities. Ms. Waller also serves on the board of directors of Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V., from April 2014 to the present and of Delta Airlines, Inc. from July 2015 to the present. Ms. Waller has a strong background in accounting and finance as well as substantial business and leadership experience in the beverage industry.

Mark S. Vidergauz—Director of the Company and member of the Compensation Committee since June 1998, member of the Audit Committee from April 2000 through May 2004, and Lead Independent Director since March 2014. Chief Executive Officer of The Sage Group LLC, an investment banking firm, from April 2000 to the present. The Sage Group LLC provides merger, acquisition and capital formation advisory services to a wide range of companies in the consumer sector. Managing Director at the Los Angeles office of ING Barings LLC, a diversified financial service institution headquartered in the Netherlands, from April 1995 to April 2000. Mr. Vidergauz brings strong merger and acquisition, corporate finance, corporate governance and leadership experience to the board.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT STOCKHOLDERS VOTE “FOR” THE ELECTION OF EACH OF THE NOMINEES FOR DIRECTOR SET FORTH ABOVE.

MANAGEMENT

Board Meetings and Committees; Annual Meeting Attendance

The Board is comprised of Rodney C. Sacks, Hilton H. Schlosberg, Mark J. Hall, Norman C. Epstein, Gary P. Fayard, Benjamin M. Polk, Sydney Selati, Harold C. Taber, Jr., Kathy N. Waller  and Mark S. Vidergauz. The Board held six meetings during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015.  Each director attended the annual meeting held on August 7, 2015. During the 2015 period in which he or she was a director, each director attended at least 75% of the aggregate total number of meetings of the Board of Directors and Board Committees in which he or she was a member. The Board has determined that Messrs. Epstein, Fayard, Polk, Selati, Taber and Vidergauz are independent, as that term is defined in the NASDAQ Marketplace Rules and SEC regulations. Our independent directors met in executive session three times during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015. The Board does not have a policy requiring the attendance by the directors at the Annual Meeting.

During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, the Audit Committee was comprised of Norman C. Epstein (Chairman until February 27, 2015), Harold C. Taber, Jr. and Sydney Selati (Chairman since February 27, 2015). The Board of Directors has adopted a written charter for the Audit Committee, which is available on our website at http://investors.monsterbevcorp.com/governance.cfm. The Audit Committee held four meetings during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015. The Audit Committee last met in February 2016 in connection with the review of the Company’s financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015.  See “Audit Committee” below for more information.

15

Table of Contents

During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, the Compensation Committee was comprised of Norman C. Epstein (Chairman), Mark S. Vidergauz, Sydney Selati and Harold C. Taber. The Compensation Committee held three meetings during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015.  Under  the Monster Beverage Corporation 2011 Omnibus Incentive Plan, (the “2011 Incentive Plan”), the Compensation Committee has sole and exclusive authority to grant equity awards to all employees and consultants who are not new hires and to all new hires who are subject to Section 16 of the Exchange Act.  The Compensation Committee and the Executive Committee each independently has the authority to grant awards for new hires and promotions for employees who are not Section 16 employees. The Board of Directors has adopted a written charter for the Compensation Committee, which is available on our website at http://investors. monsterbevcorp.com/governance.cfm. The Board has adopted written Equity Grant Procedures. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Compensation Program Components - Long-Term Incentive Program” and “Compensation Committee” below for more information.

During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, the Nominating Committee was comprised of Harold C. Taber, Jr. (Chairman), Norman C. Epstein and Sydney Selati. The Board has adopted a written charter for the Nominating Committee, which is available on our website at http://investors. monsterbevcorp. com/governance.cfm. The Nominating Committee held one meeting during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015. See “Nominating Committee” below for more information.

The Executive Committee, comprised of Rodney C. Sacks and Hilton H. Schlosberg, held twelve meetings during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015. The Executive Committee manages and directs the business of the Company between meetings of the Board. Under the 2011 Incentive Plan, each of the Compensation Committee and the Executive Committee of the Board independently has the authority to grant awards for new hires and promotions for employees who are not Section 16 employees. Awards granted by the Executive Committee are not subject to approval or ratification by the Board or the Compensation Committee (see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Compensation Program Components - Long-Term Incentive Program” below for more information).

Non-Employee Director Stock Ownership Policy

The Board has adopted stock ownership guidelines regarding stock ownership by non-employee Board members.  As amended, these guidelines provide that each non-employee director of the Company has three years from the date of appointment to satisfy the minimum stock ownership requirement and hold a minimum of 3,000 shares of Common Stock.  During 2015, all non-employee directors complied with the non-employee director stock ownership policy.

16

Table of Contents

Director Resignation Policy

The Board has a director resignation policy. This policy provides that, in an uncontested election, any incumbent director nominee who receives a greater number of votes “WITHHELD” from his or her election than votes “FOR” his or her election must promptly tender his or her resignation to the Board following certification of the election results. The Nominating Committee will review the circumstances surrounding the election and recommend to the Board whether to accept or reject the resignation. The Board must act on the tendered resignation.  If such resignation is rejected, the Board must publicly disclose its decision, together with the rationale supporting its decision, within 90 days after certification of the election results. A copy of the director resignation policy is available on our website at http://investors.monsterbevcorp.com /governance.cfm.

Board Leadership Structure

The Board of Directors does not have a policy on whether or not the roles of Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board should be separate and, if they are to be separate, whether the Chairman of the Board should be selected from the non-employee directors or be an employee. The Board of Directors believes that it should be free to make a choice from time to time in any manner that is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders.  The Board believes that the Company’s current Chief Executive Officer is best situated to serve as Chairman of the Board. Rodney C. Sacks has led the Company for over 26 years and therefore is highly knowledgeable with respect to the Company’s business, operations and industry. Mr. Sacks is well positioned to identify strategic priorities and lead the Board’s consideration and analysis of such priorities. The Board believes that the combined role of Chairman and CEO promotes consistency and efficiency in the development and execution of the Company’s business strategy.

Lead Independent Director

In March 2014, the independent directors of the Board approved a Lead Independent Director Charter.  Under the Lead Independent Director Charter, if the offices of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer are held by the same person, the independent members of the Board of Directors will annually elect with a majority vote an independent director to serve in a lead capacity. Although elected annually, the Lead Independent Director is generally expected to serve for more than one year. The Lead Independent Director may be removed or replaced at any time with or without cause by a majority vote of the independent members of the Board.

Mr. Vidergauz is currently the Lead Independent Director. In this capacity, Mr. Vidergauz is, among other things, responsible for leading executive sessions of the independent directors and serving as the principal liaison between the Chairman, Vice Chairman and the independent directors. A copy of the Lead Independent Director Charter is available on our website at http://investors.monsterbevcorp.com/ governance.cfm.

The Board’s Role in Risk Oversight

The Board of Directors plays an active role in overseeing and managing the Company’s risks.  The full Board and its Executive Committee regularly review the Company’s results, performance, operations, competitive position, business strategy, liquidity, capital resources, product distribution and development, material contingencies and senior personnel, as well as the risks associated with each of these matters. The

17

Table of Contents

Board implements its risk oversight function both as a whole and through its standing committees. Certain of the work is delegated to committees, which meet regularly and report back to the full Board. The Compensation Committee oversees management of risks related to the Company’s compensation policies and practices. The Audit Committee oversees management of risks related to financial reporting and internal controls. The full Board also discusses risk throughout the year during meetings in relation to specific proposed actions including risks related to cybersecurity. These processes are designed to ensure that risks are taken knowingly and purposefully. The Board believes that its role in oversight of risk management (as well as the role of the Compensation and Audit Committees) has not adversely affected its leadership structure or results of operations.

The names and ages of our Named Executive Officers, who we refer to as our NEOs, and certain biographical information about them, are set forth on page 12 and below.

Thomas J. Kelly – Senior Vice President Finance and/or Controller and Secretary of MEC since 1992.  In his position as Senior Vice President Finance, Mr. Kelly frequently reports directly to the Executive Committee and our Board of Directors. Prior to joining MEC, Mr. Kelly served as controller for California Copackers Corporation.  Mr. Kelly is a Certified Public Accountant (inactive) and has worked in the beverage business for over 30 years.

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Compensation Philosophy

Our executive compensation program for our NEOs, as described in the following pages, is designed to emphasize equity compensation in the form of stock options, restricted stock and/or restricted stock units in addition to cash compensation as a means of motivating and retaining executive talent, rewarding those individuals fairly over time for achieving performance goals under the business plan and creating shareholder value through continued profitable growth. The program is designed to reinforce ownership and overall entrepreneurialism and to link rewards to measurable corporate and qualitative individual performance. The program is based on principles and is not formulaic in its approach, particularly the cash bonus program and equity program.  When making compensation decisions the Company considers its performance versus its internal goals and external benchmarks. Consideration is also given to both operating performance and to shareholder return, as well as to the role the NEO has in achieving his goals.  In applying these principles we seek to integrate compensation programs with our short- and long-term strategic plans and to align the interests of our NEOs with the long-term interests of our stockholders. The Compensation Committee evaluates risks and rewards associated with the Company’s overall compensation philosophy and structure and does not believe the program promotes excessive risk-taking.

18

Table of Contents

With respect to specific elements of compensation, base salary is a fixed amount to secure executive service, the annual cash bonus opportunity is designed to incentivize and reward achievement of short-term financial and operating performance, and equity grants that vest over multi-year periods are designed to incentivize, retain and provide long-term perspective.

Setting Executive Compensation

The compensation programs for our NEOs are generally administered by or under the direction of the Compensation Committee (in the case of Rodney Sacks, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and Hilton Schlosberg, the Vice Chairman and President) and the Executive Committee (in the case of the other NEOs). The compensation program is reviewed annually to ensure that remuneration levels and benefits are competitive and reasonable and continue to achieve the goals set forth in our compensation philosophy. In reviewing the compensation for Mr. Sacks and Mr. Schlosberg, the Compensation Committee recognizes that Mr. Sacks and Mr. Schlosberg serve as our co-leaders.  Given the long-term complimentary nature of their leadership and their contributions to our success, the Compensation Committee has determined it is appropriate to continue to compensate them equally.

For 2015 compensation decisions, the Compensation Committee retained the independent compensation consulting firm, Frederic W. Cook & Co., Inc. (“FWC”), to provide competitive market data and make recommendations to the Board with respect to compensation for outside directors and make recommendations to the Compensation Committee and to the Executive Committee with respect to compensation for our NEOs and senior management. FWC reports directly to the Compensation Committee and did not perform any other services for the Company in 2015. The Compensation Committee determined that the services provided by FWC did not raise any conflicts of interest.

The Compensation Committee considers relevant market pay practices and performance when setting executive compensation. We do not set compensation at a targeted percentile level relative to the market, but we seek to provide salary, incentive compensation opportunities and employee benefits that are generally competitive within the consumer products industry, the food and beverage industry and within the labor markets in which we participate. Within this framework, we seek to keep salary and cash bonus below the median for our NEOs, with equity awards providing enhanced compensation opportunities. We gather market compensation and performance data to provide context, but also consider performance, as well as our recruiting and internal retention experience when making executive compensation decisions.

The Compensation Committee consulted with FWC in late 2014 to conduct a 2015 competitive market analysis (the “Early 2015 Market Analysis”) using a comparison group of similarly sized, high performing U.S. food and beverage and consumer products companies (the “Early 2015 Peers”). The Early 2015 Peers were the same as the peers referenced in 2014 with the exception of three companies.  Beam Inc., Boston Beer Co. and Snyder’s-Lance were removed due to acquisition or because they were not within the objective size criteria for revenues and market capitalization set by FWC (revenues between $1.0 billion and $11.0 billion, and market capitalization between $2.5 billion and $50.0 billion).  These three prior peers were replaced with The Estee Lauder Companies, Inc., The Hershey Company, and Ralph Lauren, three larger market capitalization companies with well-known consumer brands that met the objective size criteria.

19

Table of Contents

The Early 2015 Peers include:

The Early 2015 Market Analysis was considered in determining the NEOs’ 2015 compensation.

In December 2015, FWC reviewed the Early 2015 Peers and removed Nu Skin Enterprises Inc. and The Whitewave Foods Company as a result of market capitalization values below the established criteria. These companies were replaced with L Brands, Inc., PVH Corp., Starbucks Corporation, V.F. Corporation and YUM! Brands, Inc. to form the Late 2015 Peer Group (the “Late 2015 Peers”). Compensation and performance data of the Late 2015 Peers were considered in determining 2015 bonuses and 2016 salaries for our NEOs.

Taking into consideration the Early 2015 Market Analysis, the Compensation Committee set Mr. Sacks’ and Mr. Schlosberg’s 2015 cash compensation below the median of the Early 2015 Peers, and granted above-median equity compensation to them, with the result that their total compensation was roughly consistent with the Early 2015 Peers 75th percentile (about the 65th percentile of the Late 2015 Peers). The Early 2015 Market Analysis noted that the performance of the Company was above the median in three-year revenue and earnings per share (“EPS”) growth, return on capital, and both one- and three-year Total Shareholder Return (“TSR”). This level of operating and TSR performance, which was considered significant by the Committee, was factored into the compensation decisions.  The Early 2015 Market Analysis showed the Company closer to the 75th percentile in most performance measures, which was consistent with its performance relative to the Late 2015 Peers. The peer group data is only one reference point used by us when making compensation decisions. However, we generally believe that reviewing and analyzing this pay and performance information is an important component of our executive compensation decision-making process.

The Company historically did not grant equity awards annually to Mr. Sacks and Mr. Schlosberg, but instead provided equity awards periodically to align their compensation with performance on a discretionary basis.  Equity awards were granted to Mr. Sacks and Mr. Schlosberg in 2013 to reward them for the Company’s strong performance in 2011 and 2012 to further align their interests with our stockholders.  Beginning in 2014, the Company moved to an annual grant philosophy to overlap vesting and provide a portfolio of vesting dates for equity awards. The 2015 option and restricted stock unit awards granted to Mr. Sacks and Mr. Schlosberg were made under this annual grant philosophy as well as to reward for the Company’s continued strong performance in 2014 and 2015 and further align their interests with our stockholders. Recent equity awards granted to Mr. Sacks and Mr. Schlosberg vest over a three-year period with the exception of certain stock awards granted in March 2016. The March 2016 stock awards were granted in lieu of a portion of 2015 cash bonuses, and as a result, were fully vested at grant to equate to a cash award.

20

Table of Contents

Compensation decisions for Mr. Kelly and Mr. Hall were discretionary and not based on specific performance targets.  However, the Company considered FWC’s competitive market analysis for guidance in determining the total compensation for Mr. Kelly and Mr. Hall.   Mr. Hall’s compensation was generally set relative to the market data in a manner similar to Mr. Sacks’ and Mr. Schlosberg’s, with below-median salary and cash bonus offset by above-median long-term equity compensation value in stock options to emphasize continued shareholder growth and to recognize that options have been an effective incentive for motivating high performance during his 19 years of tenure as an employee of the Company. Recent equity awards granted to Mr. Hall typically vest over a three- to five-year period and recent equity awards granted to Mr. Kelly typically vest over a five-year period.

We view all components of compensation as related but distinct. We determine the appropriate level for each compensation component, based in part, but not exclusively, on competitive benchmarks gathered through our recruitment and retention experience, our review of internal comparatives as well as other considerations we deem relevant, such as rewarding for individual as well as for corporate performance. We believe that equity awards effectively reward for long-term performance and are an important compensation-related motivator to attract and retain executives through the vesting periods and promote sharing in the value they create. Except as described herein, neither our Compensation Committee nor our Executive Committee have adopted any formal or informal policies or guidelines for allocating compensation between short-term and long-term and current compensation between cash and non-cash compensation. However, our Compensation Committee and Executive Committee’s respective philosophy is that a greater percentage of our NEOs’ compensation should be rewarded in long-term equity rather than short-term cash, and we believe that this philosophy has benefited our long-term performance by attracting, retaining, and motivating a long-tenured NEO group that has built significant long-term value for our shareholders.  Compensation packages for each of our NEOs are tailored to each individual NEO’s circumstances by the Compensation Committee and/or the Executive Committee, as appropriate, and are largely based on subjective evaluations of overall and individual performance. Each element of compensation is determined differently for each individual NEO, based on a variety of facts and circumstances applicable at the time and to that specific NEO.

Our Compensation Committee and Executive Committee’s current intent is to perform an annual strategic review of compensation paid to our NEOs to determine whether they have provided adequate incentives and motivation to such NEOs, and whether they adequately compensate our NEOs relative to comparable officers in other companies with which we compete for executives. For compensation decisions, including decisions regarding the grant of equity compensation relating to NEOs, other than our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and our Vice Chairman and President, the Compensation Committee specifically considers recommendations from the Executive Committee.

Results of 2015 Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation

At our 2015 annual meeting of Stockholders, 97.5% of the votes cast were in favor of our advisory resolution regarding the compensation of our NEOs.  The Compensation Committee believes this affirms the stockholders’ support of the Company’s pay-for-performance philosophy with respect to executive compensation. The Compensation Committee will continue to consider the results of future advisory votes on executive compensation.

Compensation Program Components

Our NEO compensation currently has three primary components: base compensation or salary, annual cash bonus, and equity awards granted pursuant to our 2011 Incentive Plan.

21

Table of Contents

Each of the primary components of NEO compensation is discussed below.

Base Salary

Base salaries for our NEOs are established based on the scope of their individual responsibilities, taking into account competitive market remuneration paid by other companies for individuals in similar positions. We fix NEO base compensation at levels which we believe enable us to retain individuals in a competitive environment (but without any fixed formula) and reward performance based upon contributions to our overall business goals. We may also utilize input on compensation from compensation consultants, executive search firms and market data when making crucial hiring decisions.

The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors determines the base salaries for Mr. Sacks and Mr. Schlosberg and the Executive Committee (comprised of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and the Vice Chairman and President) determines the base salaries for the other NEOs.

For 2015, the annual base salary for each of Mr. Sacks and Mr. Schlosberg were increased from $600,000 to $625,000 to align their base salaries with approximately the 20th percentile of our Early 2015 Peers.  Mr. Halls’ annual base salary was increased to $500,000 in connection with his promotion to Chief Marketing Officer effective January 1, 2015.  For 2015, Mr. Kelly’s annual base salary was increased from $270,000 to $300,000 to align his base salary with our peer group.

Annual Cash Bonus Opportunity

We provide incentive compensation to our NEOs partly in the form of a discretionary annual cash bonus based on a qualitative review of individual and company-wide financial and operational performance, consistent with our emphasis on pay-for-performance incentive compensation programs. The Compensation Committee determines the annual bonuses for Mr. Sacks and Mr. Schlosberg and the Executive Committee (comprised of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and the Vice Chairman and President) determines the annual bonuses for the other NEOs.

The 2015 cash bonuses were not determined in a formulaic manner. In determining 2015 bonus awards, our Compensation Committee and Executive Committee considered all of our performance achievements and reviewed various strategic factors, including sales revenues, high relative profit growth, distribution levels, introduction of new products, corporate partnerships, overall operating performance, contribution margins, profitability and total shareholder return, which are used as a broad guide of overall performance. We generally utilize annual cash bonuses to reward performance for the time horizon of one year or less.  Consistent with the Company’s strategy of focusing on long-term equity over short-term cash compensation, the bonus payments have been relatively low compared to our peer group.

The actual amount of the annual bonus is determined and paid in the first quarter following a qualitative review of each NEO’s individual performance and contribution to our strategic goals during the prior year. The 2015 bonus awards for each of Mr. Sacks and Mr. Schlosberg were $500,000, $300,000 for Mr. Hall and $150,000 for Mr. Kelly. In early 2016, Mr. Sacks and Mr. Schlosberg were each awarded 2,000 fully vested stock units as part of their 2015 bonus, with a grant value of $263,920. The purpose of paying a portion of their 2015 bonus award in equity was to increase the alignment of their interests with shareholders.  The remaining portion of their 2015 bonus awards, and the full 2015 bonus awards for the other NEOs, was paid in cash.

22

Table of Contents

Long-Term Incentive Program

We believe that long-term performance is achieved through an ownership culture that encourages superior performance by our NEOs through the use of equity awards and, as a result, the compensation program emphasizes equity awards over cash compensation. Our equity compensation plans have been established to provide our NEOs with incentives to further align their interests with the interests of the stockholders. Equity compensation to our NEOs generally vests over three to five years.  Stock options are our preferred form of long-term incentive compensation because we believe they are simple, tax-deferred, and inherently performance-based with value earned only if the price of our common stock appreciates after the options are granted.  In 2015, Mr. Sacks and Mr. Schlosberg were granted a mix of options and restricted stock units in order to provide a growth incentive as well as a long-term employment retention incentive.

The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors reviews and approves equity awards to our NEOs based upon compensation data principally gathered through a market analysis conducted by our independent compensation consultants, our recruiting and retention experience, our qualitative assessment of individual performance, as well as a review of each executive’s current long-term incentives and retention considerations.

On March 13, 2015, the NEOs were granted the following number of non-qualified stock option grants with a per share exercise price of $135.48, the fair market value of a share of our stock on the date of grant, as determined under the 2011 Incentive Plan: Mr. Sacks – 79,200 options; Mr. Schlosberg – 79,200 options; Mr. Hall – 100,000 options; and Mr. Kelly – 12,000 options.  The options granted to each of Mr. Sacks and Mr. Schlosberg vest in three equal annual installments on each of March 13, 2016, 2017 and 2018, subject to the NEO’s continued employment through each vesting date.  The options granted to each of Mr. Hall and Mr. Kelly vest in five equal annual installments on each of March 13, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019 and 2020, subject to the NEO’s continued employment through each vesting date.

On March 13, 2015, each of Mr. Sacks and Mr. Schlosberg were granted 38,100 restricted stock units that vest in three equal annual installments on each of March 13, 2016, 2017 and 2018, subject to the NEO’s continued employment through each vesting date.

Other Compensation

Certain NEOs who are parties to employment agreements will continue to be subject to such agreements in their current form based on the terms of such agreements, or upon renewal as the Compensation Committee determines in its discretion that revisions to such employment agreements are recommended. For a summary description of the terms of these agreements, see “Discussion of Summary Compensation Table - Agreements with Named Executive Officers” below.

In addition, we intend to continue to maintain our current benefits and perquisites for our NEOs. The perquisites include payment of the cost and expense for personal use of a Company automobile and the payment of benefit premiums under certain employee benefit plans. In addition, pursuant to their employment agreements, for Mr. Sacks and Mr. Schlosberg we pay all initial and annual fees and all other reasonable expenses relating to membership in up to two business or social clubs selected by the executive. However, the Compensation Committee in its discretion may revise, amend or add to such NEOs benefits and perquisites if it deems it advisable. We believe these benefits and perquisites are currently in line with those provided by comparable companies within the consumer products industry, the food and beverage industry and within the labor markets in which we participate, for similarly situated executives, based principally on information gathered through our recruiting and retention experience.

23

Table of Contents

Employee Benefit Plans

Our employees, including our NEOs, are entitled to various employee benefits, which generally include health care plans, flexible spending accounts, life and disability insurance, 401(k) Plan, paid time off, automobile benefits, as well as other allowances.

401(k) Plan

Our employees, including our NEOs, may participate in our 401(k) Plan, a defined contribution plan that qualifies under Section 401(k) of the Code.  Participating employees may contribute up to statutory limits. We make discretionary matching contributions, and currently (from January 1, 2016) match 50% of our employee contributions, up to 6% of each employee’s earnings on a per pay period basis, which vest at a rate of 25% upon completion of two years of service, 50% upon completion of three years of service and 100% upon completion of four years of service. During 2015, we matched 25% of our employee contributions, up to 8% of each employee’s earnings on a per pay period basis, which vests at a rate of 20% each year for five years after the first anniversary date.

Separation and Change in Control Arrangements

Certain of our NEOs, per the terms of their respective employment agreements and/or equity award agreements, are eligible for certain benefits and/or payments if there is a change in control and/or a termination of their employment, as described under “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” beginning on page 30.

We believe these arrangements are an important part of overall compensation and will help to secure the continued employment and dedication of our NEOs prior to or following a change in control, notwithstanding any concern that they may have at such time regarding their own future and continued employment. In addition, we believe that these arrangements are an important recruitment and retention incentive. These arrangements do not provide for tax gross ups.

Tax Implications

Section 162(m) of the Code imposes a $1 million limit on the deduction that we may claim in any tax year with respect to compensation paid to any of the NEOs, excluding the principal financial officer. However, the Code allows for certain types of performance-based exemptions to this $1 million limit, provided that the compensation plan meets certain requirements. Our stock option grants generally comply with the performance-based exemption of Section 162(m). The Compensation Committee, which is comprised solely of “outside directors” as defined for the purposes of Section 162(m) of the Code, believes that stockholder interests are best served if the Compensation Committee’s discretion and flexibility in awarding compensation is not restricted, even though some compensation awards may result in non-deductible compensation expenses.  Therefore, the Compensation Committee reserves the right to authorize payments or take other actions that can result in the payment of compensation that is not deductible for income tax purposes.

24

Table of Contents

Summary Compensation Table

The following table summarizes the total compensation of our NEOs during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013.  During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, our NEOs were Rodney C. Sacks, Hilton H. Schlosberg, Mark J. Hall and Thomas J. Kelly.

(1)               The amounts represent the current year grant date fair value for all share-based payment awards computed in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 718 based on the estimated fair value of the options on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing formula with the following assumptions:

(A) All Other Compensation

25

Table of Contents

Discussion of Summary Compensation Table

Agreements with Named Executive Officers:

Rodney C. Sacks – On March 18, 2014, we entered into a new employment agreement with Mr. Sacks (the “Sacks Employment Agreement”), pursuant to which Mr. Sacks renders services as our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. Under the Sacks Employment Agreement, Mr. Sacks’ annual base salary will be reviewed annually and increased at the discretion of our Board. Mr. Sacks is eligible to receive an annual bonus in an amount determined at the discretion of our Board as well as certain fringe benefits. The employment period of this agreement commenced on January 1, 2014 and continues through December 31, 2018, subject to automatic one year renewal periods on each December 31 thereafter, unless notice of intent to not renew is given by either us or Mr. Sacks by June 30, 2018 or any subsequent June 30, as may be applicable. Under the Sacks Employment Agreement, Mr. Sacks is subject to a confidentiality covenant and a six-month post-termination non-competition covenant. The Sacks Employment Agreement is subject to termination (i) upon the death or disability of Mr. Sacks, (ii) voluntarily by Mr. Sacks on 90 days’ written notice, (iii) for Cause (as defined therein) by us, or (iv) upon Constructive Termination (as defined therein) by Mr. Sacks. The severance provisions in the Sacks Employment Agreement are discussed in the “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” section below. Since January 1, 2009, we entered into certain equity compensation agreements with Mr. Sacks as disclosed in the “Grants of Plan-Based Awards” table below.

Hilton H. Schlosberg – On March 18, 2014, we entered into a new employment agreement with Mr. Schlosberg (the “Schlosberg Employment Agreement”), pursuant to which Mr. Schlosberg renders services as our Vice Chairman, President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer. Under the Schlosberg Employment Agreement, Mr. Schlosberg’s annual base salary will be reviewed annually and increased at the discretion of our Board. Mr. Schlosberg is eligible to receive an annual bonus in an amount determined at the discretion of our Board as well as certain fringe benefits. The employment period of this agreement commenced on January 1, 2014 and continues through December 31, 2018, subject to automatic one year renewal periods on each December 31 thereafter, unless notice of intent to not renew is given by either us or Mr. Schlosberg by June 30, 2018 or any subsequent June 30, as may be applicable. Under the Schlosberg Employment Agreement, Mr. Schlosberg is subject to a confidentiality covenant and a six-month post-termination non-competition covenant. The Schlosberg Employment Agreement is subject to termination (i) upon the death or disability of Mr. Schlosberg, (ii) voluntarily by Mr. Schlosberg on 90 days’ written notice, (iii) for Cause (as defined therein) by us, or (iv) upon Constructive Termination (as defined therein) by Mr. Schlosberg. The severance provisions in the Schlosberg Employment Agreement are discussed in the “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” section below. Since January 1, 2009, we entered into certain equity compensation agreements with Mr. Schlosberg as disclosed in the “Grants of Plan-Based Awards” table below.

26

Table of Contents

Mark J. Hall – On October 28, 2013, Mr. Hall entered into an agreement (the “Hall 2013 Agreement”) with MEC.  Pursuant to the Hall 2013 Agreement, Mr. Hall agreed to serve as a member of the Board for at least one year, effective January 1, 2014. Effective January 1, 2014, Mr. Hall resigned as President of the Monster Beverage Division and was appointed Chief Brand Officer of MEC, for which Mr. Hall received an annual salary of $250,000. Mr. Hall was eligible to receive an annual bonus in an amount determined at the discretion of our Executive Committee as well as certain fringe benefits. The Hall 2013 Agreement provided for a sabbatical and leave of absence for Mr. Hall from October 28, 2013 through December 31, 2013. Since January 1, 2009, we entered into certain equity compensation agreements with Mr. Hall as disclosed in the “Grants of Plan-Based Awards” table below.

On March 12, 2015, Mr. Hall entered into a new employment agreement (the “Hall 2015 Agreement”) with MEC. The Hall 2015 Agreement confirmed Mr. Hall’s position change from Chief Brand Officer to Chief Marketing Officer of Monster Energy on a full-time basis, effective as of January 1, 2015.  As Chief Marketing Officer of Monster Energy, Mr. Hall received an annual base salary of $500,000 in 2015.  Mr. Hall is also eligible to receive an annual bonus in an amount to be determined at the discretion of our Executive Committee. The Hall 2015 Agreement provides that Mr. Hall’s employment as Chief Marketing Officer of Monster Energy is of an at-will nature, for no specified period of time. Pursuant to the Hall 2015 Agreement, if Mr. Hall’s employment with MEC is terminated without cause, Mr. Hall will be entitled to receive three months of severance pay (or severance pay as negotiated between the parties), subject to certain restrictions, as well as all applicable employee benefits of MEC during such three-month period.

Thomas J. Kelly – Mr. Kelly’s employment is “at will” and thus may be terminated at any time for any or no reason.  Mr. Kelly received an annual base salary of $300,000 in 2015. Mr. Kelly is eligible to receive an annual bonus in an amount determined at the discretion of our Executive Committee as well as certain fringe benefits. Since January 1, 2009, we entered into certain equity compensation agreements with Mr. Kelly as disclosed in the “Grants of Plan-Based Awards” table below.

Grants of Plan-Based Awards

The following table summarizes grants of plan-based awards granted to our NEOs during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015.

(1)         The amounts represent the current year grant date fair value for all share-based payment awards computed in accordance with ASC 718.

27

Table of Contents

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

The following table summarizes the outstanding equity awards held by our NEOs at December 31, 2015.

28

Table of Contents

(1) Vest as follows: 70,000 on June 3, 2016

(2) Vest as follows: 70,000 on March 14, 2016; 70,000 on March 14, 2017

(3) Vest as follows: 12,700 on March 13, 2016, 12,700 on March 13, 2017, 12,700 on March 13, 2018

(4) Vest as follows: 26,400 on March 13, 2016, 26,400 on March 13 2017, 26,400 on March 13, 2018

(5) Vest as follows: 5,000 on September 1, 2016

(6) Vest as follows: 20,000 on March 14, 2016; 25,000 on March 14, 2017; 30,000 on March 14, 2018

(7) Vest as follows: 4,500 on March 14, 2016; 6,000 on March 14, 2017; 7,500 on March 14, 2018; 9,000 on March 14, 2019

(8) Vest as follows: 20,000 on March 13, 2016; 20,000 on March 13, 2017; 20,000 on March 13,2018; 20,000 on March 13, 2019; 20,000 on March 13, 2020

(9) Vest as follows: 1,500 on June 1, 2016; 1,500 on June 1, 2017

(10) Vest as follows: 3,000 on March 14, 2016; 3,750 on March 14, 2017; 4,500 on March 14, 2018

(11) Vest as follows: 1,500 on March 14, 2016; 2,000 on March 14, 2017; 2,500 on March 14, 2018; 3,000 on March 14, 2019

(12) Vest as follows: 500 on December 1, 2016; 500 on December 1, 2017

(13) Vest as follows: 2,250 on December 1, 2016; 3,000 on December 1, 2017; 3,750 on December 1, 2018; 4,500 on December 1, 2019

(14) Vest as follows: 2,400 on March 13, 2016; 2,400 on March 13, 2017; 2,400 on March 13, 2018; 2,400 on March 13, 2019; 2,400 on March 13, 2020

Options Exercised and Stock Vested

The following table summarizes exercise of stock options and stock vested by our NEOs during the Company’s fiscal year ended December 31, 2015.

(1)        The value realized upon the exercise of the stock options reflect the number of options multiplied by the difference between the closing stock price of our common stock on the date of the exercise and the exercise price of the options.

(2)          The value realized upon vesting of the stock awards is based on the closing stock price of our common stock on the date the  awards vested.

Pension Benefits

We do not maintain or make contributions to a defined benefit plan for any of our NEOs.

Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation

None of our NEOs participated or have account balances in non-qualified defined contribution plans or other deferred compensation plans maintained by us. The Compensation Committee may elect to provide our NEOs or other employees with non-qualified defined contribution or deferred compensation benefits should they deem such benefits appropriate.

29

Table of Contents

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

We have entered into certain agreements and maintain certain plans that may require us to make certain payments and/or provide certain benefits to our NEOs in the event of a termination of their employment or a change of control. The following tables and narrative disclosure summarize the potential payments to each of our NEOs assuming that one of the events listed in the tables below occurs. The tables assume that the event occurred on December 31, 2015, the last day of our fiscal year.

Key Employment Agreement and Equity Award Agreement Definitions

For purposes of the Sacks Employment Agreement and the Schlosberg Employment Agreement described in this section, “cause” (under which we may terminate their employment) is defined as: (i) an act or acts of dishonesty or gross misconduct on the executive’s part which result or are intended to result in material damage to our business or reputation; or (ii) repeated material violations by the executive of his obligations relating to his position and duties, which violations are demonstrably willful and deliberate on the executive’s part and which result in material damage to our business or reputation and as to which material violations our Board has notified the executive in writing.

For purposes of the Sacks Employment Agreement and the Schlosberg Employment Agreement described in this section, constructive termination (under which they may terminate their employment) is defined as: (i) without the written consent of the executive, (A) the assignment to the executive of any duties inconsistent in any substantial respect with the executive’s position, authority or responsibilities as contemplated by the position and duties described in his employment agreement, or (B) any other substantial adverse change in such position, including titles, authority or responsibilities; (ii) any failure by us to comply with any of the provisions of his employment agreement, other than an insubstantial or inadvertent failure, remedied by us promptly after receipt of notice thereof given by the executive; (iii) our requiring the executive without his consent to be based at any office location outside of Riverside County, California or Orange County, California, except for travel reasonably required in the performance of the executive’s responsibilities; or (iv) any failure by the Company to obtain the assumption and agreement by a successor entity to perform his employment agreement, provided that the successor entity has had actual written notice of the existence of his employment agreement and its terms and an opportunity to assume the Company’s responsibilities under his employment agreement during a period of 10 business days after receipt of such notice.

For purposes of the Sacks Employment Agreement and the Schlosberg Employment Agreement described in this section, disability is defined as any disability which would entitle the executive to receive full long-term disability benefits under our long-term disability plan, or if no such plan will then be in effect, any physical or mental disability or incapacity which renders the executive incapable of performing the services and obligations required of him relating to the executive’s position and duties for a period of more than 120 days in the aggregate during any 12-month period during the employment period.

For purposes of the restricted stock unit agreements with Mr. Sacks and Mr. Schlosberg, good reason is defined as termination of employment on or after a reduction in his compensation or benefits, his removal from his current position, or his being assigned duties and responsibilities that are inconsistent with the dignity, importance of scope of his position.

For purposes of the restricted stock unit agreements with Mr. Sacks and Mr. Schlosberg, cause is defined as an act of fraud or dishonesty, knowing and material failure to comply with applicable laws or regulations, or drug or alcohol abuse, in any case as determined by the Board.

30

Table of Contents

For purposes of the stock option agreements with Mr. Sacks and Mr. Schlosberg, change in control is defined as: (i) the acquisition of “Beneficial Ownership” by any person (as defined in rule 13(d)–3 under the Exchange Act), corporation or other entity other than us or a wholly-owned subsidiary of 20% or more of our outstanding stock; (ii) the sale or disposition of substantially all of our assets; or (iii) our merger with another corporation in which our Common Stock is no longer outstanding after such merger.

For purposes of the stock option agreements with Mr. Sacks and Mr. Schlosberg, cause (under which we may terminate their employment) is defined as the individual’s act of fraud or dishonesty, knowing and material failure to comply with applicable laws or regulations or drug or alcohol abuse; and good reason (under which they may terminate their employment) is defined as a reduction in the individual’s compensation or benefits, the individual’s removal from his current position or the assignment to the individual of duties or responsibilities that are inconsistent with the dignity, importance or scope of his position with us.

For purposes of all the stock option agreements, total disability is defined as the complete and permanent inability of the executive to perform all his duties of employment with us.

For purposes of the Hall 2015 Agreement, “good cause” (under which we may terminate employment with no obligation to pay severance) will include: (i) the neglect, breach of duty, or any failure to perform, to the reasonable satisfaction of the Executive Committee; (ii) the conviction of a felony, or any determination by the Executive Committee of the commission of theft, larceny, embezzlement, fraud, dishonesty, illegality, moral turpitude, harassment or gross mismanagement; (iii) the death or material disability to such an extent that, even with reasonable accommodation, the executive is precluded from performing the essential duties of his position; or (iv) the breach of the Hall 2015 Agreement or any fiduciary duties to MEC.

For purposes of the stock option agreements with Mr. Hall, change in control is generally defined as: (i) the acquisition of “beneficial ownership” by any person (as defined in Rule 13(d)–3 under the Exchange Act), corporation or other entity other than us or a wholly-owned subsidiary of ours of 50% or more of our outstanding stock; (ii) the sale or disposition of substantially all of our assets; or (iii) our merger with another corporation in which our Common Stock is no longer outstanding after such merger.

For purposes of the stock option agreements with Mr. Hall and Mr. Kelly, cause (under which we may terminate their employment) is defined as the individual’s act of fraud or dishonesty, knowing and material failure to comply with applicable laws or regulations or satisfactory performance of his duties of employment, insubordination or drug or alcohol abuse.

31

Table of Contents

32

Table of Contents

33

Table of Contents